
FREE AI RESEARCH PROMPT
IPO Implied Operating Scale Audit
Reverse an IPO offer price into the revenue scale, reinvestment, market share, and survival assumptions a stated FCFF scenario would require.
What this prompt gives you
An IPO price is easier to examine when you translate it into an explicit operating scenario.
This prompt starts with the offer price and post-offer capital structure. It then solves for one unknown: the additional annual revenue the company would need to reach by the end of a fixed forecast horizon under your stated margin, reinvestment, discount-rate, terminal, TAM, and survival assumptions.
The output is an expectations audit. It is not a price target, forecast, or recommendation.
The useful question is not whether the company sounds exciting. It is what operating scale must be true for this specific scenario to reconcile with the offer price.
Inputs to prepare
Gather the following before you run the prompt:
Company name, ticker, IPO pricing date, and base currency.
Final prospectus or latest registration-statement URL.
Offer price, primary and secondary shares offered, post-offer basic shares, underwriter option, options, warrants, RSUs, and other dilutive claims.
Latest revenue, operating margin, cash, debt, preferred claims, noncontrolling interests, and non-operating assets, each with an as-of date.
Forecast horizon, fixed revenue-path shape, margin path, cash-tax path, sales-to-capital ratios, WACC, terminal growth, terminal RONIC, survival probability, and failure-state recovery.
A sourced TAM with scope, geography, currency, as-of date, and a nominal or real growth assumption that matches the model basis.
If an input is missing, the analyst must source it, label it as an assumption, or stop. It must not fill the gap with an uncited rule of thumb.
Copy-ready prompt
Copy everything in this section into your AI tool, then replace the square-bracket fields.
You are a sober IPO expectations analyst. You are not my investment adviser. Do not recommend buy, sell, or hold. Do not call the offer price fair or unfair. Your only job is to translate the offer price into the operating scale required by one fully specified scenario and show every formula, unit, source, and limitation.
My inputs
Company and ticker: [COMPANY, TICKER]
IPO pricing or valuation date: [DATE]
Final prospectus or latest filing: [URL]
Offer price or proposed range: [PRICE]
Base currency and basis: [CURRENCY, NOMINAL OR REAL]
Latest revenue and period: [REVENUE, PERIOD]
Forecast horizon N: [YEARS, DEFAULT 10]
TAM today, scope, geography, source, and as-of date: [TAM DETAILS]
Any assumptions I want fixed: [OPTIONAL]
Source rules
Use the final prospectus, normally Form 424B4 for a completed US IPO, or the latest S-1 or F-1 amendment for an unpriced deal. Use company filings for financials and capital structure. Use authoritative first-party sources for TAM and macro inputs.
Attach a URL and as-of date to every external input. Mark every value as reported, calculated, or assumed. Keep reported, pro forma, and fully diluted figures separate.
Use one currency and one nominal or real basis throughout. If conversion is necessary, state the FX rate, source, and date.
Do not use an uncited sector multiple, historical superlative, or claim that no company has achieved something.
Step 1: Build the post-offer equity value
Calculate offer equity value as offer price multiplied by post-offer fully diluted shares. Reconcile basic post-offer shares, primary shares, secondary shares, the underwriter option, options, warrants, RSUs, convertibles, and any earnouts. Show a base case and a full-underwriter-option case when relevant. For options and warrants, use a treasury-stock or equivalent incremental-share method that recognizes strike proceeds, or value the claim separately. Never do both. Do not add primary shares again if they are already included in the reported post-offer count, and do not treat proceeds from secondary shares as company cash.
Step 2: Bridge equity value to operating enterprise value
Calculate Target Operating EV = Offer Equity Value + debt and other debt-like claims + preferred claims + noncontrolling interests - post-close cash - separately valued non-operating assets. Reconcile post-close cash once: pre-offer cash plus primary net proceeds, less debt repaid or other uses at closing. Do not add proceeds again if the filing already reports an as-adjusted cash balance.
Step 3: Freeze the scenario before solving
Set every assumption independently of the unknown. Use a normalized cumulative revenue path q_t with q_0=0, q_N=1, and nondecreasing values between them. Use q_t=t/N only if no better fixed path is defensible, and label it as an assumption. Fix the EBIT-margin path m_t, cash-tax path tau_t, positive sales-to-capital ratio SC_t, WACC, terminal growth g_inf, terminal RONIC, survival probability p, present failure-state recovery V_fail, TAM growth, and every as-of date. Set cash tax to zero in loss years unless a sourced tax benefit is actually realizable. Require WACC greater than g_inf, terminal RONIC greater than g_inf, and g_inf divided by terminal RONIC between zero and one.
Step 4: Solve one scalar
Let s be terminal incremental revenue in the model currency. This is the only unknown in this run.
Revenue_t(s) = Revenue_0 + s q_t
IncrementalRevenue_t(s) = s(q_t - q_(t-1))
Reinvestment_t(s) = IncrementalRevenue_t(s) / SC_t
NOPAT_t(s) = Revenue_t(s) x m_t x (1 - tau_t)
FCFF_t(s) = NOPAT_t(s) - Reinvestment_t(s)
TerminalFCFF_(N+1)(s) = Revenue_N(s) x (1 + g_inf) x m_N x (1 - tau_N) x (1 - g_inf / terminal RONIC)
TerminalValue_N(s) = TerminalFCFF_(N+1)(s) / (WACC - g_inf)
GoingConcernValue(s) = sum of FCFF_t(s)/(1+WACC)^t for t=1 to N, plus TerminalValue_N(s)/(1+WACC)^N
ExpectedOperatingValue(s) = p x GoingConcernValue(s) + (1-p) x V_fail
F(s) = ExpectedOperatingValue(s) - Target Operating EV
Project TAM to year N using the stated growth basis. Set S_max = TAM_N - Revenue_0. If S_max is negative, stop because revenue and TAM are not comparable. Solve only on the bounded domain s in [0,S_max].
Step 5: Certify the root
Do not use a finite grid or sign-change count as proof. Under the fixed assumptions above, F(s)=a+b s is affine and continuous. Compute a=F(0) and b=F(1)-F(0) with unrounded high-precision values.
If b is positive, F is strictly increasing. If b is negative, F is strictly decreasing.
A root exists exactly when zero lies between F(0) and F(S_max). Check both boundaries explicitly. If a boundary equals zero, report that exact boundary root.
If b is nonzero and the root is in the domain, the unique root is s* = -a/b.
If b=0 and a is nonzero, there is no root. If b=0 and a=0, every s in the domain is a root. Return the full scenario family and do not claim uniqueness.
For a nonconstant affine function, tangent roots, even-multiplicity roots, closely spaced multiple roots, and more than one root are impossible. State this as part of the certificate.
If b is negative, show the mathematics but label the scenario economically adverse because more revenue reduces value under the fixed reinvestment and margin assumptions. Do not describe that root as a conventional required scale.
Step 6: Report the implied expectations
Show terminal revenue Revenue_N(s*), the full annual revenue and FCFF table, terminal EBIT margin, cumulative reinvestment, terminal TAM, and implied terminal market share. If Revenue_0 is positive, calculate implied CAGR = (Revenue_N/Revenue_0)^(1/N)-1. If Revenue_0 is zero, state that CAGR is undefined and show the absolute revenue ramp.
Compare the result with a peer universe defined before looking at the answer. For every benchmark, state the universe, metric definition, population, timeframe, sample size when known, source, as-of date, and whether the number is measured or estimated. Use within-range or outside-observed-range language. Do not use fantasy, impossible, or unprecedented without a complete, sourced comparison universe.
Step 7: Run separate sensitivities
Rerun the one-scalar solve separately for changes in WACC, terminal margin, sales-to-capital ratio, survival probability, failure recovery, TAM growth, and terminal RONIC. One cell equals one fully fixed scenario and one scalar solve. Never goal-seek two assumptions at once. If two or more parameters are free, return a scenario family instead of a unique answer.
Final format
Source and as-of table
Post-offer share-count and dilution bridge
Equity-to-operating-EV bridge
Fixed scenario assumptions
Annual revenue, reinvestment, NOPAT, FCFF, and present-value table
Root-existence and uniqueness certificate
Implied terminal revenue, CAGR or absolute ramp, margin, TAM, and share
Separate sensitivity table
Evidence-based comparison and adversarial checks
Limitations and a final line stating: This is an expectations audit, not investment advice or a forecast.
How to read the answer
Focus on the bridge and the assumptions before the solved number.
Equity value: Check whether the share count is post-offer and fully diluted. A clean market-cap input can still be wrong if primary shares, secondary shares, the underwriter option, or employee claims are mixed together.
Operating enterprise value: Check whether post-close cash and debt are reconciled once. The FCFF model values operating assets, not cash that has already been separated in the bridge.
Root certificate: A unique result is valid only for the fixed scenario and bounded domain shown. It does not mean the price reveals a uniquely true business future.
No-root result: This means the price cannot be reconciled inside the stated assumptions and TAM bound. It does not prove that the security is mispriced.
Sensitivity: If small changes in WACC, reinvestment, margin, survival, or terminal economics produce large changes in required scale, the answer is assumption-sensitive.
Adversarial checks
Reject the output and rerun it if any of these checks fail:
Future cash flows or terminal value are not discounted to the valuation date.
An equity-value multiple is applied to an enterprise-value metric, or the reverse.
IPO proceeds are counted twice, secondary proceeds are treated as company cash, or fully diluted shares are ignored.
Revenue grows without the reinvestment needed to support it.
Terminal growth, RONIC, reinvestment, and WACC are economically inconsistent.
A successful-company DCF is presented as expected value without survival and failure-state treatment.
Current TAM is used as the denominator for future revenue without a consistent TAM-growth path.
Two or more operating assumptions are goal-seeked from one observed price.
A finite grid or sign-change scan is presented as uniqueness proof.
Peer claims lack a defined universe, timeframe, sample size when known, source, or as-of date.
Limits and source discipline
The model is deliberately narrow. It converts one price into one conditional operating-scale requirement. It does not identify a free multi-year business plan, predict what management will deliver, or decide whether an investment fits you.
Read the most recent prospectus and risk factors in full. The SEC explains that a final prospectus generally contains final offering terms and that regulatory review is not an approval of the merits or a guarantee that disclosure is complete or accurate.
Method references: SEC Investor Bulletin: Investing in an IPO, SEC EDGAR filings, Damodaran on cash flows, enterprise value, and claimholder consistency, and Damodaran on young-company valuation and failure states.
For educational and research purposes only. Not investment advice.
FROM INSIGHT TO PROCESS
Research is useful. A process you can trust is better.
Crypto Gameplan helps self-directed investors connect research, market regime, selection, risk, and exits into a documented decision process, without living in front of your computer or giving up control.
Education and research. You make and execute every final decision.

© 2026 Crypto Gameplan. All Rights Reserved.



